Skip to main content

Candlemas , Conversion and Christian Doctrine

 It looks like it was around last Candlemas, so just about a year ago, that I started reading Cardinal JH Newman's An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine.   A year later almost to the day, I have got to the last page.   I've been trying to figure out for a few days how to write about the book; it seems to call for an approach suited to its particular style.   I may not be the one to do that, however!   There are some very notable theologians who have studied Newman.   Ian Ker, Aidan Nichols, and Louis Bouyer are a few who come to mind.  

I'll start by linking to the posts where I talked about the book, mostly from a year ago.   Since I haven't written consistently on here for a while, perhaps that will also give me a chance to review what I was thinking when I started reading it.

January 27:  Councils, Controversies and Communio.   This is probably the line of thinking that made me decide to read the book in the first place.   There are several links to articles by Newman scholars and other commentators.   It was a long and rambling post but I'll put it here for the sake of completeness, and also for the links to helpful resources. 

January 30:  For Which Our Nature is Made.    This post discusses an article by Dr Martin Bruske, in Communio, about Newman's Essay.   

Oh, and he mentioned Newman's sermon on Candlemas, from 1843.   This was Newman's earlier thinking on doctrinal development through a reflection on Mary.  At the time he was still an Anglican.  

February 1:  Cultivating the Soil.   Looks like I had started reading by St Brigid's Day, if not before!  

February 7:  Living and Real Ideas.    About Chapter 1.  

February 15:   The Full Comprehension and Perfection of Great Ideas.  

February 29:  Development and Illumination

March 4:  Impressions

March 15:  Testimony of our Predecessors .  Not about Newman's essay directly, but a look at an article by Dr Larry Chapp.    The short version is that true development will be focused on Christ rather than culture.

It looks like I stopped there and didn't resume reading until this fall.     In fact, until recently I wasn't reading much at all beyond fiction, which is probably part of the reason for how quiet this blog has been.  

I wrote about that, and about development of doctrine, on January 7 2025:

  Every new beginning comes from some other beginning's end.   

Now that I've listed past thinkings on the book, I will try to add links to any new posts on here.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exousia and Potestas

I've been thinking a lot about power and authority, as one does nowadays.   It's the meta-topic in many of the Catholic ecclesial struggles nowadays, of course.  I don't think anyone would dispute that, but it's odd how little it is actually mentioned specifically.    Maybe it's not odd.   Maybe the principles are simply assumed for the most part.  Today I looked up the Latin for "authority", specifically the Vulgate word used in the Luke 20:2 passage , which has been on my mind.    Here's the passage -- the pronoun refers to Jesus: One day as he was teaching the people in the temple area and proclaiming the good news, the chief priests and scribes, together with the elders, approached him 2 and said to him, “Tell us, by what authority are you doing these things? Or who is the one who gave you this authority?” The Latin word used i n the Vulgate is " potestas "   et aiunt dicentes ad illum dic nobis in qua potestate haec facis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...
Post a Comment
Read more