Skip to main content

Between Creator and Creature

 "Do you want to grasp the majesty of God?  First grasp the humility of God.....When you grasp the humility of God, then you will rise with Him."  St Augustine, Sermon 117

John Betz quotes this at the beginning of his article on The Humility of God.   His aim, as I mentioned in the last post, is to put the two theological positions, of Balthasar and contemporary Thomism, into conversation with each other.       He mentions Erich Przywara, specifically his work on the analogia entis, as a potential bridge between Balthasar's ideas on the humility of God and the concerns of Thomists on the subject.      Przywara was mentor to Balthasar and to Edith Stein, notably, but is no longer well known.     From the review on Betz's book on Przywara's thought:

Przywara aims, ultimately, to defend philosophically a declaration of the Fourth Lateran Council: "Because a similitude between the creator and the creature cannot be discerned without there being a greater dissimilitude between them to be noted." 

This formulation of the Lateran Council is very directly concerned in the disputed question between Thomists and Balthasarians on this idea of kenosis and humility.    It relates to what we understand by the term humility.     Aquinas, when talking specifically about humility in his works, applies it particularly to the Son of Man, to the Incarnated God.   God in HIs Essence does not have humility in the sense of recognizing His own limitations, the way we do.

But there is another way of thinking of humility, as the volition and practice of stooping down, a relational thing.   Parent-child metaphors come to mind here quite naturally.   A mother spends quite a bit of time serving her infant because the infant is needy and helpless, not because he is in charge. 

In that way of thinking about humility, all of Scripture is a documentation of God's humility as a very feature of His majesty, as in the Augustine quote above.    Every Psalm of praise is an inventory of all the things God does for us and for the cosmos in general.   

As Betz points out, it is in this way that humility is constitutive of love.     When we love, we give what we have, we share,  we disclose ourselves, we serve.   The Scriptures are a documentation of God's stable and gratuitous love for humans.   And this love is far greater than our deficiencies which He has flooded with His abundance.  

Our humility is very different, of course.  Etymologicially it is derived from humus, ground, and we are literally formed from the ground and will return to it.      Plus we are broken by sin.    We can't attribute that form of humility to God, and yet, the Father did send the Son to take on our form, and the Son did willingly submit to being sent, to emptying Himself and taking the form of a slave.   It seems intuitively obvious that this reflects something real about Who God Is, even if it does shade off into mystery; and that He has allowed this to be seen, even if through a glass darkly, at present.

I was planning to bring another element into this, which Betz also draws out, and indeed which is the main point of St Paul in Philippians 2 -- the corresponding exhortation to imitate Him.    Imitation already implies a certain likeness, even if incomplete, and definitely the Lord's kenosis calls for a response:

2 Fulfill ye my joy, that you may be of one mind, having the same charity, being of one accord, agreeing in sentiment. 3 Let nothing be done through contention, neither by vain glory: but in humility, let each esteem others better than themselves: 4 Each one not considering the things that are his own, but those that are other men's......
13 For it is God who worketh in you, both to will and to accomplish, according to his good will. 14 And do ye all things without murmurings and hesitations; 15 That you may be blameless, and sincere children of God, without reproof, in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation; among whom you shine as lights in the world.

I'll leave it there for now, but that is one further thing that's evident in this crux or median point between God and Man, which is the Word -- that the response involves our whole selves.      As Augustine says, we rise with Him;  He was lifted up on the Cross that He might draw all to Himself.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...

The Exogorth's Interior

"This is no cave!" -- Princess Leia  One facet of Cardinal Newman's perception in regard to Ideas and development of doctrine is that we who are downstream from the theologians and philosophers are given a language and a kind of mythology associated with that language, and these things comprise the tools we are able to use or sometimes transcend.     This seems to tie in a bit with what Bishop Varden said about generations in regard to the reception of Vatican II .   The first generation is in the middle of the event, the second generation is trying to consolidate or dispute that legacy, and the third generation is sometimes baffled by the preoccupations of their elders.   But they are still holders of the legacy the thing has left.   They have to decide what it is going to mean to them -- what is ephemeral, situational, and what is durable.     For example -- an example that comes to mind after reading various takes on Ne...