Skip to main content

Of Polysemy and Poetry

 The poet James Matthew Wilson says in an interview:  

A steady focus of my work over the years—and I am not alone in this—has been the contemplation of things in their being, existence, mystery, and meaning: the way in which, not only Scripture and poetry are polysemous, but the multiple meanings of things in general help us understand human activity and also the natural order of the world. It is a three-step theme. Seeing things as they are and discovering that, when seen in this way, their depths open up. They reveal their connections to other things. These connections in turn lead us not only to see the natural order with all its parts, its congeries of beings. As Thomas Aquinas says in the introduction to his Commentary on the Divine Names of Pseudo-Dionysius, they lead us up to the creator of all things, God himself. This attempt to perceive the intrinsic being and goodness of things is part of the general literary quest. It is not particular to me. It is the reason people read books in the first place: to hear news of God and know the order and cause of all things. 

Polysemous is a good word.   It is the capacity of a sign (such as a word)  to have multiple meanings.    Something that sometimes boggles logical discourse actually enriches and deepens poetry or even ordinary conversation.     

Natural things can be signs in this manner.   Today we are celebrating the solemnity of the Baptism of the Lord, which in the revised calendar ushers in the Octave of Epiphany.   In Baptism, water becomes the matter of a sacrament, without losing what it already is by nature.  

God can make natural things into signs in this manner, because he made the natural things.   He makes history work this way too, where things prefigured in the prophets and in historical events gain resonance and fulfillment in the Incarnation and Redemption.  

Poets and artists reflect Creation in their sub-creations, as Wilson points out and as Tolkien said in the poem referenced yesterday.    

 Even families do this -- almost every functional family has a collection of words or jokes that have meaning within that family but would puzzle someone hearing them.    In fact, it seems to me that a kind of word-life is one trait of a healthy community.   Not in the sense of vague language, like mission statements full of jargon that can meaning anything or nothing -- quite the opposite, in fact.     





 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...

Exousia and Potestas

I've been thinking a lot about power and authority, as one does nowadays.   It's the meta-topic in many of the Catholic ecclesial struggles nowadays, of course.  I don't think anyone would dispute that, but it's odd how little it is actually mentioned specifically.    Maybe it's not odd.   Maybe the principles are simply assumed for the most part.  Today I looked up the Latin for "authority", specifically the Vulgate word used in the Luke 20:2 passage , which has been on my mind.    Here's the passage -- the pronoun refers to Jesus: One day as he was teaching the people in the temple area and proclaiming the good news, the chief priests and scribes, together with the elders, approached him 2 and said to him, “Tell us, by what authority are you doing these things? Or who is the one who gave you this authority?” The Latin word used i n the Vulgate is " potestas "   et aiunt dicentes ad illum dic nobis in qua potestate haec facis ...

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...