Skip to main content

Of Sacred Monsters

The War is not over (and the one that is, or the part of it, has been largely lost). But it is of course wrong to fall into such a mood, for Wars are always lost, and War always goes on; and it is no good growing faint. -- JRR Tolkien

Reading Tracey Rowland's summary of what is now sometimes called "Strict Observance Thomism" revived my interest in Fr Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, a Dominican scholar who died in 1964.   He has been called the "monstre sacre" of Thomism, and someone called Richard Peddicord has written a book with that title:

The Sacred Monster of Thomism

Here's a short overview with list of table of contents.

There are several reviews around the internet.   Of recent years there has been a revival of scholarly interest in Garrigou Lagrange, apparently.   

The appellation of sacred monster was applied to Garrigou-Lagrange by Francois Mauriac, according to the book.  In French the term means 

a venerable or popular public figure who is considered above criticism or attack despite eccentricity, controversy, etc.

or similarly

"Someone whose immense talent might seem almost unnatural, and whom few people would dare criticize."

In our day, of course, a lot of Sancho Panzas make an industry out of attacking and cancelling supposedly unassailable types.   

 Most Catholics who have heard of Garrigou-Lagrange at all put him in the category of dry, dessicated neo-Scholasticist, but the book makes it clear that this is not a fair portrait of the man.    Among other things, he was Karol Wojtyla's doctoral adviser, and also taught Marie-Dominique Chenu as well as associated with Jacques Maritain, though both the latter were at odds with him later -- Chenu because of his interest in how history interacts with doctrine, and Maritain because their politics diverged in the very polarized climate of France at the time between the two world wars.  

Anyway, the book was well worth reading because it brings the pre-Vatican-II conflicts to life and sketches out the key theological and spiritual concerns that motivated this prolific Dominican.   

I had already read a couple of his books -- The Three Ages of the Interior Life, and one other I can't remember the name of.   One I would like to read is his book on Common Sense, but the English translation is expensive.  I'm going to try out my college French on the version available online.  

I like thinking of all the holy monstrosities I will meet in heaven someday, should I be so blessed.     I can't help picturing them as affable versions of the Notre Dame grotesques, or like those figures on the margins of medieval manuscripts.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...

The Exogorth's Interior

"This is no cave!" -- Princess Leia  One facet of Cardinal Newman's perception in regard to Ideas and development of doctrine is that we who are downstream from the theologians and philosophers are given a language and a kind of mythology associated with that language, and these things comprise the tools we are able to use or sometimes transcend.     This seems to tie in a bit with what Bishop Varden said about generations in regard to the reception of Vatican II .   The first generation is in the middle of the event, the second generation is trying to consolidate or dispute that legacy, and the third generation is sometimes baffled by the preoccupations of their elders.   But they are still holders of the legacy the thing has left.   They have to decide what it is going to mean to them -- what is ephemeral, situational, and what is durable.     For example -- an example that comes to mind after reading various takes on Ne...