Skip to main content

From Grace to Grace

 I have just finished reading From Grace to Grace:  Memoirs of Jean Leclercq.    You can read a bit about the book here:  

When Jean Leclerq entered the Abbey of Clervaux at age 17 in 1928, he wanted only to be a monk. In the years that followed he found "grace upon grace" as his desire for God and love of learning found rich expression in the life of a warm, joyful priest and internationally renowned monastic scholar.

A summary of his life and work is here.

 Basically, the book came about, as he writes in his preface, because friends encouraged him to write it.  He resisted initially;  Henri de Lubac, one of his many friends, told him it was a duty, and added:  "Do it, before you lose your memory."     Still, even as the book went to print, he had qualms, not liking to talk about himself in print.  

This shows in his book, but in a rather charming way.   He was a world traveller, sent by his Abbey to Asia, Africa, North and South American, even Australia and the Philippines, to give talks and consultation about monasticism to various audiences.    He met many well known people and saw many different circumstances, but maintained a consistent geniality and tranquillity through everything.   He seemed to me an epitome of the Benedictine vows:  stability, conversion, and obedience; he went where he was sent, he seemed to have an internal cloister, so to speak, which kept him on an even keel through a bewildering diversity of travels, both before and after Vatican II.   He also seemed to have a kind of openness which expressed itself in friendships with many different people, notably Thomas Merton with whom he exchanged many letters.   He had a keen interest in "enculturation", a post-conciliar word which was developed to deal with evangelization in countries where cultures had developed without previous exposure to Christianity.   But his criteria was essentially monastic, Christocentric.  

His memoirs were called a "florilegium" by his Italian translator and that seems like a good description.   I read somewhere that they were put together from his notes on his journeys and that is how they read --- as if your great-uncle were showing you slides of his journeys, interspersed with humor and bits of insight, and references to people he had known and books he had read or sometimes written.

I read his memoirs right after I read Thomas Merton's The Seven Storey Mountain.    It has taken me six decades to get to Merton's classic work -- I think because it was so big and I had the impression it was some sort of mystical manual.   In fact, as everybody else probably already knows, it is an autobiography, and I read it because I knew Merton and Leclercq were friends.  

Merton's book is rather a page-turner -- at least it was to me.    He was far more introspective than Leclercq, and of course had quite a dramatic conversion, whereas Leclercq grew up Catholic, knew from a young age he wanted to enter the monastery, and in fact entered at age 17, and never looked back.    Merton seems very postmodern to me, though he was born before WW1 like Leclercq.    He is interested in personalities, in nature, in moods and turning points.   Leclercq's life seems like a mosaic with bits and pieces all integrated:   from grace, to grace, indeed.     Merton longed to live as a hermit, while Leclercq seemed to carry his hermitage with him, so wherever he went he was at peace and free to be involved in whatever came his way.     

Next I will read Survival or Prophecy, which is a collection of the letters exchanged between the two monks.   And I'm still rereading Love of Learning and the Desire for God which was what started me on this book trail in the first place.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...

The Exogorth's Interior

"This is no cave!" -- Princess Leia  One facet of Cardinal Newman's perception in regard to Ideas and development of doctrine is that we who are downstream from the theologians and philosophers are given a language and a kind of mythology associated with that language, and these things comprise the tools we are able to use or sometimes transcend.     This seems to tie in a bit with what Bishop Varden said about generations in regard to the reception of Vatican II .   The first generation is in the middle of the event, the second generation is trying to consolidate or dispute that legacy, and the third generation is sometimes baffled by the preoccupations of their elders.   But they are still holders of the legacy the thing has left.   They have to decide what it is going to mean to them -- what is ephemeral, situational, and what is durable.     For example -- an example that comes to mind after reading various takes on Ne...