Skip to main content

Leclercq on Monastic Culture: Contents and Preface

Love of Learning and Desire for God, a study of monastic culture by Dom Jean Leclercq, is divided into three main sections, totalling ten chapters, an introduction, and an epilogue.   The introduction is called Learning and Spirituality; the Epilogue is called Literature and the Mystical Life.  The sections are on:   the formation, the sources, and the fruits of monastic culture.

The first section, on formation of monastic culture, traces some of the early history of monasticism.   He starts with the conversion of St Benedict, then moves to Pope St Gregory the Great, then briefly discusses some of the figures of what is called the Carolingian Renaissance.  

The second section is on sources of monastic culture.  These are listed as:  devotion to heaven, sacred learning, ancient traditional spirituality, and liberal studies.

The third section, on the fruits of monastic culture, discusses:  literary genres used by monastics, monastic theology, and the "poem of the liturgy."

Here are some notes on Jean Leclercq's brief preface. .. basically a summary and paraphrase.  It is worth going into a bit of detail because he explains his intentions for the book, what he means it to be and does not mean it to be. 

  1.  This book began life as a series of lectures to young monks.   It contains generalizations inevitable in a comprehensive work, and is not targeted to a scholarly audience already well informed in this field.
  2. It is not a synthesis, which would be premature. nor a bibliography.   His purpose is to draw attention to subjects that warrant further investigation, though he will suggest partial and provisional solutions at times.   His sources are written documents of doctrinal or spiritual character, excluding works on geography and science and the like, which in any case were less common.   He rarely will cite a source later than the early 13th century.
  3. He has made many simplifications and generalizations that would call for supporting arguments, shading, further definitions that are sometimes available in other books.   He mentions several authors that have done much work in medieval studies but says there hasn't been a book written on this specific topic, pulling together and summarizing materials that haven't been considered together before.
  4. Does monastic culture have its own identifying characteristics?  What are they?  It is difficult to decide, and might look different from inside and outside the monastery walls.   
  5. All that is available from this past time are pictures and writings.  Does that mean the truth can not be known at this current date?    He acknowledges the limits but even with possible distortions and even falsifications, he thinks we can get a sense at least of what monastics aspired to.  He says his purpose is "less to pass judgment than to understand."    The picture built up is at least of the monastics' true self, the self they wanted to be.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...

Exousia and Potestas

I've been thinking a lot about power and authority, as one does nowadays.   It's the meta-topic in many of the Catholic ecclesial struggles nowadays, of course.  I don't think anyone would dispute that, but it's odd how little it is actually mentioned specifically.    Maybe it's not odd.   Maybe the principles are simply assumed for the most part.  Today I looked up the Latin for "authority", specifically the Vulgate word used in the Luke 20:2 passage , which has been on my mind.    Here's the passage -- the pronoun refers to Jesus: One day as he was teaching the people in the temple area and proclaiming the good news, the chief priests and scribes, together with the elders, approached him 2 and said to him, “Tell us, by what authority are you doing these things? Or who is the one who gave you this authority?” The Latin word used i n the Vulgate is " potestas "   et aiunt dicentes ad illum dic nobis in qua potestate haec facis ...

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...