Skip to main content

The Council and Its Aftermath

Dietrich von Hildebrand calls "Ecclesiam Suam" by Pope Paul VI "luminous" and Dogmatic Constitution on the Church "magnificent".   He certainly wasn't targeting the Vatican Council itself in his book, but rather some of the subsequent excrudescences that took its name. 

The Church is always in need of renewal, he says.   Renewal in this context means reform, restoration, elimination of worldly accretions.   Hiistorical examples he gives:

  • The Benedictine and Franciscan reforms (Cluny and St Bernadine)
  • The Council of Trent and other decisive councils
  • reform of St Gregory VII

Other examples could probably be added.

He quotes Vatican II -- Lumen Gentium:

The Council "desires now to unfold more fully to the faithful of the Church, and to the whole world its own inner nature and universal mission.  This it intends to do following faithfully the teachings of previous Councils."  

On the process of renewal in the history of the Church:

"(This) involves, on the one hand, the refutation of heresies, which are continually trying to invade the Church, and, correlatively, an increasingly explicit dogmatic formulation of revealed truth, a process described by Cardinal Newman in his Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine."

From this perspective, Vatican II's aim was to divest the Church of a certain legalism and rigidity that had crept in, which was secular in its origin and risked strangling the true life of the Church.    Remember from the past chapter that he had named a third way apart from "progressive" and "reactionary".   This is the "instaurare omnia in Christo".   On one hand, expansion of understanding and expression of what has been handed down; on the other hand, discarding anything false that has been brought in.

At this point, he doesn't explain exactly of what the legalism and rigidity consisted.   James Hitchcock has written about a certain type of Pelagianism that may have infiltrated the pre-Vatican II congregations.   Ordinary people whether Protestant, Catholic or "none" were finding it easy to do the right thing.  The post WWII culture supported it.   They were in danger of thinking that a good life could be lived easily.    Speaking in 1958, Joseph Ratzinger had already noted a "new paganism" affecting the European continent. ...subtler but as pervasive as communist diktat.  Some have noted that neo-Scholastic manualism had almost become a victim of its own success.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...

The Exogorth's Interior

"This is no cave!" -- Princess Leia  One facet of Cardinal Newman's perception in regard to Ideas and development of doctrine is that we who are downstream from the theologians and philosophers are given a language and a kind of mythology associated with that language, and these things comprise the tools we are able to use or sometimes transcend.     This seems to tie in a bit with what Bishop Varden said about generations in regard to the reception of Vatican II .   The first generation is in the middle of the event, the second generation is trying to consolidate or dispute that legacy, and the third generation is sometimes baffled by the preoccupations of their elders.   But they are still holders of the legacy the thing has left.   They have to decide what it is going to mean to them -- what is ephemeral, situational, and what is durable.     For example -- an example that comes to mind after reading various takes on Ne...