Skip to main content

Conversion and (Eu)Catastrophe

 It won't be long until Lent.  At the Benedictine abbey where we went to Mass yesterday, it was Septuagesima Sunday -- and Lent points out the importance in a Christian life for regular conversion.   It's not just a one time thing.  

Conversion comes from the Latin conversio, meaning “to turn around.” In the New Testament, the Greek writers used the word metanoia, meaning a change of heart, particularly toward repentance. Conversion involves both turning away from a past life and turning toward God, resulting in an interior transformation of the person. Conversion can mean turning from sin to repentance, from laxity to fervor, from unbelief to faith, from error to truth.  What is Conversion?

(Wiktionary has more on the etymology and present day variety of uses of the word.).

The similarity between the Latin "versio" or turning in that word and the Greek "strophe" or turning in the word eucatastrophe is interesting.     Eucatastrophe seems to refer to a kind of conversion of the plot or event sequence, when things that seemed to be going one way take a turn in a seemingly very different direction (a good one)

Conversion is similarly a turn in a different direction and euconversion, if that's not too much of a language-mix, would be a turn in a good direction.   St Paul is an obvious example of a sudden and complete conversion.     The epistle reading for Septuagesima Sunday is the 1 Corinthians passage  about running the race so he shall not be disqualified.

Conversion, either for the better or worse, is almost the essential engine of literary fiction.    The protagonist generally has to undergo change during the course of the events and in turn influence that very turn of events.  Conversion of the protagonist or subject, and conversion by the protagonist of the course of events, is fairly indispensable.

And for good reason, it seems, because a story or history is almost by definition an interaction between the characters and their situation that comes to a resolution.   Agonist is a chemistry term, in fact, but comes from the Greek for contestant, struggle, drive.   

Perhaps a good time to quote the passage from St Paul linked above!

Brethren, know you not that they that run in the race, all run indeed, but one receiveth the prize? So run that you may obtain. And every one that striveth for the mastery, refraineth himself from all things; and they indeed that they may receive a corruptible crown, but we an incorruptible one. I therefore so run, not as at an uncertainty: I so fight, not as one beating the air: but I chastise my body and bring it into subjection: lest, perhaps, when I have preached to others, I myself should become a castaway. 

The necessity in one's life for conversion is not dispensed with by staying out of Christianity's fold.    You can see people in life who don't see the necessity for struggle against themselves.   Usually it's not a good look.   As St Paul mentions, every athlete, everyone who strives, is going to have to train and self-deny in order to succeed.   Is money, or love, or fitness, or knowledge, or a prize, the supreme goal?   Conversion involves sorting through possible goals and putting them in order.  Often, over and over again, since they have a way of reshuffling themselves when we aren't paying attention.  

In literature, there are some stories with high-stakes conversion plots and some with more modest or even trivial eucatastrophes.   Some of it depends on the genre of the literary work.  In detective fiction, the bringing to justice is the highest good; in romance, it's the relationship; in epics it seems to be some kind of restored and renewed stability, perhaps?  Also within stories, there are often minor turns, both in the agonist and in the narrative.  

 One's life too can be filled with micro-conversions which may or may not contribute to the real good of the whole life, the final effect.   I don't want to give negative examples, because what is a trivial distraction to one person may be a genuine turn to the good for another person.    Kathleen Norris wrote in Acedia and Me that sometimes for her, neglecting to get up at a normal hour and brush her hair and teeth was a beginning symptom of a slide into depression; and turning to doing these things in that respect could show the beginnings of a true and important recovery.    For someone who is not ill or a very small child or the mother of one, basic hygiene may be not be the struggle that St Paul described.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...

The Exogorth's Interior

"This is no cave!" -- Princess Leia  One facet of Cardinal Newman's perception in regard to Ideas and development of doctrine is that we who are downstream from the theologians and philosophers are given a language and a kind of mythology associated with that language, and these things comprise the tools we are able to use or sometimes transcend.     This seems to tie in a bit with what Bishop Varden said about generations in regard to the reception of Vatican II .   The first generation is in the middle of the event, the second generation is trying to consolidate or dispute that legacy, and the third generation is sometimes baffled by the preoccupations of their elders.   But they are still holders of the legacy the thing has left.   They have to decide what it is going to mean to them -- what is ephemeral, situational, and what is durable.     For example -- an example that comes to mind after reading various takes on Ne...