Skip to main content

Things Fall Apart

 I read Chinua Achebe's first novel, Things Fall Apart, when I was 15 or 16.   I believe it was assigned in my 10th grade English class, though it might have been 11th grade.   I was attending an international school in Switzerland, run on mostly British lines with reference to O and A Levels, though an International Baccalaureate degree was also available.

I don't remember much of the plot detail of the book, just my ongoing feeling of "NO!  NO! Just... don't!" as the protagonist made mistake after mistake that even a 15 or 16 year old could see wasn't going to turn out well for anyone.    I have never had the heart to pick up the book again, though now I think perhaps I should.. perhaps for Lent?

The reason that the book has stuck with me, besides that its title refers to an endlessly evocative Yeats poem which I only heard of later, is that I was living in parallel with its storyline, and I realized it dimly at the time, and it horrified me.  It still horrifies me sometimes.

Last night, when I was thinking about this post, I went and read about the plotline of the book, to refresh my memory.    First of all, a side note -- you can't find much online about this book that isn't basically a lit study guide for students or teachers.   I find that a bit sad for a book that is thought to be one of the greatest ever written.  But Wikipedia is a help if you want to find just a regular informational summary of the book.  

Briefly Okonkwo, the protagonist, sounds to me now 40 years later as a kind of anti-Abraham.   He rejects his father's way of life, his gentleness and weakness,  and defines himself as the opposite -- strong and active.  Through the course of the novel his defiant negation, expressed in terms of solidarity with tradition,  works itself out in losing both his sons -- his foster son, whom he sacrifices because of the demand of the village oracle, and later, his biological son, who rejects his way of life and his abuse, and becomes a Christian.

The backdrop is the changing of the village from traditional religion and culture to the white man's religion and culture.    So Okonkwo, though a person in his own right and not a paradigm of African culture, can be seen as being possibly the worst, full of passionate intensity, and the best, lacking all conviction, in that he is unable to bear fruit in the changing context, and in fact commits suicide at the end of the book.     There is possibly just a hint of redemption in the way the story plays out, in that his daughter, who is most like him and supports his efforts, lives on and so does his son, as a Christian.   It's left ambiguous, as probably is realistic to Nigeria's history, what side of him can or will live on.  

When I was 15 or 16, I missed most of the ways this story reflects classic Western themes as King Lear style tragedy, Biblical patriarchal narratives, Ecclesiastes, and perhaps even antique tragedies like Agamemnon.  

What I saw was the unraveling of a life; I didn't just see it, I participated in it, partly because of the power of the depiction and also, I realize now, because I knew dimly that my own life was similarly unravelling, or could unravel in the long run.   So beyond all the differences -- Okonkwo a virile and dominating middle aged man from early-colonial Nigeria, myself a shy bookish teenage girl from Alaska transplanted to a diplomatic school near Geneva -- I felt the commonalities enormously.

We were both being demolished in a series of events and situations by what we had thought of as our best traits and principles, as they played out in a context where "things fall apart".    

So yeah, the book deeply frightened me and in a way provided me with a cautionary and finally, a way out.   And if you come across this and disagree (or agree) with my interpretation of the book, let me know.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The ideas of all things are in God

Substack is an interesting platform, and currently it is rather interesting to browse through the substacks of people who have ended up there -- sometimes, people whose writing I haven't seen for a long time.  Fr Fessio might be a good example of that.   But I am kind of stuck in the early 2000s, as far as social media goes, and I think I will have to stay here on Blogger with this site, and much as I admire focused blogs I don't think I can write one.   I think if I'm going to post with any kind of regularity, it will have to be a patchwork or a mosaic.   One of my earlier blogs I described as a commonplace book and some form of that is the most viable model, I think.     That actually brings to mind what I was reading this morning -- St Thomas Aquinas on Ideas -- this is from Msr Glenn's Tour of the Summa, which is available online.    He says: An idea or concept is the mind's grasp of an essence. It is the understanding o...

The Wind and Where it Blows

There was a recent commentary by Massimo Faggioli at Commonweal called Vatican II at Napa .   In the context of a somewhat critical look at the Napa conference, the article referenced the talk given by Bishop Erik Varden of Trondheim , who is as Faggioli says  one of the most interesting figures in a European Catholicism that is emancipating itself from the dominance of the French, Belgian, and German conciliar theology. Here is the written version of Bishop Varden's talk .   Here is what he calls a brief antiphonal response of his to Faggioli's article.     Here is his conference on the Creed , which is as he notes the main feature of his attendance at the conference.... I think the comments on Vatican II were part of a panel he participated in ?   There are a few things that came to my mind when I was reading through this interchange. One is the civil tone between two Catholic thinkers who come from very different contexts.  ...

The Exogorth's Interior

"This is no cave!" -- Princess Leia  One facet of Cardinal Newman's perception in regard to Ideas and development of doctrine is that we who are downstream from the theologians and philosophers are given a language and a kind of mythology associated with that language, and these things comprise the tools we are able to use or sometimes transcend.     This seems to tie in a bit with what Bishop Varden said about generations in regard to the reception of Vatican II .   The first generation is in the middle of the event, the second generation is trying to consolidate or dispute that legacy, and the third generation is sometimes baffled by the preoccupations of their elders.   But they are still holders of the legacy the thing has left.   They have to decide what it is going to mean to them -- what is ephemeral, situational, and what is durable.     For example -- an example that comes to mind after reading various takes on Ne...